Barefoot and Minimalist Footwear vs Conventional Shoes: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Name: SAIMSARA Evidence Object sport::BAREFOOT_VS_SHOES_PM
Creator: SAIMSARA
License: https://saimsara.com/license/

SAIMSARA

doi:10.62487/saimsara8b5ecae1

SAIMSARA Journal

Machine-Readable Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Barefoot and Minimalist Footwear vs Conventional Shoes: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Sports Medicine

Issue 5, Volume 1, 2026

Chat with this issue

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara8b5ecae1

Editorial note

• Last update: 2026-05-05 11:31:18

What is this paper about

This review maps 29 original studies comparing barefoot, minimalist, mobility, and conventional footwear across gait biomechanics, foot morphology, stability, knee loading, and performance. It shows where barefoot-like footwear may be useful — fall-risk stability, intrinsic foot strength, and knee OA load reduction — and where conventional shoes still matter, especially for impact moderation and postoperative walking capacity.

Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.

Video summary generated from this ☸️SAIMSARA evidence map. Full reference-linked paper and evidence JSON are available after purchase.

Abstract: To evaluate the impact of barefoot and minimalist footwear versus conventional shoes on foot morphology, gait biomechanics, postural stability, and athletic performance. The review utilises 29 original studies with 566 total participants (topic deduplicated ΣN). The mapped evidence indicates that barefoot and minimalist footwear conditions are consistently associated with morphological adaptations such as larger intrinsic foot muscles and stiffer longitudinal arches, improved postural and walking stability in middle-aged and older adults, and reduced medial knee loading, with mobility shoes lowering peak knee adduction moment by approximately 8% and adduction angular impulse by 7% versus conventional shoes. Conversely, conventional footwear was associated with longer step length, reduced cadence, and lower vertical instantaneous loading rates in adolescent runners alongside greater loading-rate asymmetry, suggesting trade-offs rather than uniform superiority of either condition. Topic-level signals further indicate that performance benefits in short-duration tasks such as 30 m sprinting and conventional deadlifting are limited, while postoperative populations may walk farther in conventional shoes than barefoot. Clinically, these patterns support a role for minimalist or mobility footwear as adjunct strategies for fall prevention in older adults and for offloading the medial knee compartment in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, while recognizing that responses are highly individual. The dominant uncertainty across the map is the lack of long-term data linking acute biomechanical shifts to durable morphological, performance, or injury outcomes, compounded by small samples and heterogeneous footwear definitions. Future research should prioritize longitudinal, individually profiled trials that track morphological adaptation, injury incidence, and functional stability across structured transitions between conventional and minimalist footwear in distinct age and clinical populations.

Keywords: Barefoot running; Minimalist footwear; Plantar pressure distribution; Gait biomechanics; Running economy; Postural stability; Foot morphology; Ground reaction forces; Lower limb loading; Conventional footwear

Review Stats

Final search date and database lock: 2026-04-29 22:46:47 CEST
Plan: Pro (expanded craft tokens; source: Semantic Scholar)
Source: Semantic Scholar
Total Abstracts/Papers: 118
Downloaded Abstracts/Papers: 118
Included original and non-original Abstracts/Papers (all): 32
Included original Abstracts/Papers (Vote counting by direction of effect): 29
Reference Index (links used in paper): 26
Total participants (topic deduplicated ΣN): 566

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

Full paper access includes the complete human-readable review, figures, reference index, PDF export, and machine-readable Evidence JSON download.
Evidence JSON can also be purchased separately if you only need the LLM-ready object for agent, AI, or RAG workflows.
Institutional or library access? Sign in with your institution email to open all available SAIMSARA papers under your institution access arrangement.
Need a SAIMSARA review on your own topic? ☸️Request.

Reference Index (26)

[1] How barefoot and conventional shoes affect the foot and gait characteristics in toddlers — https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273388
[2] Can the hoof be shod without limiting the heel movement? A comparative study between barefoot, shoeing with conventional shoes and a split-toe shoe. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.01.012
[3] Adolescents running in conventional running shoes have lower vertical instantaneous loading rates but greater asymmetry than running barefoot or in partial-minimal shoes — https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2023.2240174
[4] Plantar pressures in three types of indigenous footwear, commercial minimal shoes, and conventional Western shoes, compared to barefoot walking — https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2020.1825535
[5] Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09174-w
[6] Acute effects of minimalist shoes on biomechanical gait parameters in comparison to walking barefoot and in cushioned shoes: a randomised crossover study — https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2022.2057593
[7] Minimal footwear improves stability and physical function in middle-aged and older people compared to conventional shoes. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.11.005
[8] Comparison of foot loading and foot strike pattern in women running in minimalist and conventional sports shoes — https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2019.003

Unlock the full paper to view the complete Reference Index.