Future of Scientific Publishing: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

SAIMSARA

Reference Index (86)

[1] The Future of Scientific Publishing: Automated Article Generation — https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.17586
[2] A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences — https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000116
[3] Preprints and the future of scientific publishing: in favor of relevance. — https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad052
[4] The future of scientific publishing. — https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv15i2a28
[5] An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing — https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00094
[6] Editorial: the future of scientific publishing — https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9333-0
[8] Fusion of blockchain and IoT in scientific publishing: Taxonomy, tools, and future directions — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.12.036
[11] Scientific Publishing Evolution: Emerging Trends in Journal Editing – A Scoping Review — https://doi.org/10.62865/bjbio.v16i1.132
[12] Lessons from COVID-19 to future evidence synthesis efforts: first living search strategy and out of date scientific publishing and indexing industry — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.014
[14] The future of research dissemination: Innovation in publishing formats — https://doi.org/10.38105/spr.ex3016cqt0
[16] Post-Publication Review: Evolution of the Scientific Publishing Workflow — https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2024-10-3-8-21
[17] Journal impact factors and the future of open access publishing — https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14083
[20] Future of Scholarly Publishing: A Perspective — https://doi.org/10.15354/si.21.re239
[21] The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions — https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393
[22] A Study of Academics’ Perceptions of Ethical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Scientific Research and Publishing — https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251370869
[23] Open Access: The Changing Face of Scientific Publishing — https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.117400
[24] Early-career factors largely determine the future impact of prominent researchers: evidence across eight scientific fields — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46050-x
[25] Editorial Policy, DOI and (in)visibility of scientific publications — https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0000.3732
[27] The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future — https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054
[28] Use of large language models as artificial intelligence tools in academic research and publishing among global clinical researchers — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81370-6
[30] Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research — https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562
[37] Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Health Sciences Faculty Towards Scholarly Open Access and Predatory Publishing — https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2024.2373019
[39] What we should learn from pandemic publishing — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01969-7
[40] A Qualitative Study Assessing the Management of Predatory Journals and Their Publishing Activities: Results From the ASGLOS Study — https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54189
[41] Future Challenges and Opportunities in Academic Publishing — https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs28140
[43] Celebrating 15 years of Psychotraumatology – a future with generative AI? — https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2429921
[44] Open access publishing - noble intention, flawed reality. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592
[48] Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground?: A review — https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2016-0082
[49] Large and linked in scientific publishing — https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217x-1-1
[55] The Readiness of ChatGPT to Write Scientific Case Reports Independently: A Comparative Evaluation Between Human and Artificial Intelligence — https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39386
[57] Secure Reviewing and Data Sharing in Scientific Collaboration: Leveraging Blockchain and Zero Trust Architecture — https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3423338
[59] FAIR scientific information with the Open Research Knowledge Graph — https://doi.org/10.3233/fc-221513
[60] The Four Pillars of Scholarly Publishing: The Future and a Foundation — https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2014.7.7.f
[63] Transforming the Scholarly Publishing Lindworm — https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.617
[64] Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201
[65] Perspectives on scientific error — https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230448
[66] OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING — “SO NEAR AND YET SO FAR” — https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.4.05
[73] BIOfid Dataset: Publishing a German Gold Standard for Named Entity Recognition in Historical Biodiversity Literature — https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/k19-1081
[74] Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation — https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7967
[77] The future low-temperature geochemical data-scape as envisioned by the U.S. geochemical community — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104933
[81] Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on Asian scholarly journal editors’ daily life, work, and opinions on future journal development — https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.204
[82] Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise? — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111193
[84] Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS) — https://doi.org/10.1108/ilds-06-2016-0023
[88] Accurately detecting AI text when ChatGPT is told to write like a chemist — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101672
[91] Building a better future for Diversity & Distributions — https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12955
[96] Impact of Field of Study Trend on Scientific Articles — https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3007558
[99] The Importance of Preprint in Scientific Publication: Perspectives and Challenges — https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.412.642.647
[107] Elsevier's Article of the Future enhancing the user experience and integrating data through applications — https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.1.33
[108] Characteristics of retracted articles based on retraction data from online sources through February 2019 — https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/njsy8
[111] Student science publishing: an exploratory study of undergraduate science research journals and popular science magazines in the US and Europe — https://doi.org/10.22323/2.07030203
[120] A Crisis in “Open Access”: Should Communication Scholarly Outputs Take 77 Years to Become Open Access? — https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019871044
[127] Approachable Case Studies Support Learning and Reproducibility in Data Science: An Example from Evolutionary Biology — https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2022.2099487
[131] Effectively incorporating selected multimedia content into medical publications — https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-17
[133] The wave of “opinion articles” in the coverage of COVID-19 in surgical literature — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01932-w
[135] REGISTERED REPORTS AS A METHOD TO INCREASE CREDIBILITY OF SCIENCE – EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AMONG PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDENTS — https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.67.75
[143] Visibility and (alt)metrics of the Croatian Open Access (OA) journals — https://doi.org/10.7557/5.3135
[153] ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances — https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-03-2023-0043
[157] A Qualitative Study on Researchers’ Experiences after Publishing Scientific Reports on Major Incidents, Mass-Casualty Incidents, and Disasters — https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x21000911
[160] Using Bibliometric Data to Define and Understand Publishing Network Equity in Anesthesiology — https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000006877
[165] Early‐Career Publishing and Reviewing: Pitfalls and Perspectives — https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.70023
[166] Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality — https://doi.org/10.2196/37324
[175] Nanopublication-based semantic publishing and reviewing: a field study with formalization papers — https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1159
[183] Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers — https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203156
[187] Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102946
[189] Loss of sustainability in scientific work — https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac6ca1
[190] The state of artificial intelligence in medical research: A survey of corresponding authors from top medical journals — https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309208
[192] ‘AI‐navigating’ or ‘AI‐sinking’? An analysis of verbs in research articles titles suspicious of containing AI‐generated/assisted content — https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1647
[193] Effects of Research Paper Promotion via ArXiv and X — https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35809
[194] Effectiveness of a 1-day Workshop on Scientific Writing Conducted by the Indian Journal of Rheumatology — https://doi.org/10.4103/injr.injr_36_18
[199] Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience — https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00122-7
[204] Application of public blockchain to control the immutability of data in online scientific periodicals — https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-12-2018-0186
[205] The Cooperation Databank: Machine-Readable Science Accelerates Research Synthesis — https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211053319
[210] What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis — https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03972-5
[225] An Evaluation of Primary Studies Published in Predatory Journals Included in Systematic Reviews From High-Impact Dermatology Journals: Cross-sectional Study — https://doi.org/10.2196/39365
[226] Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study — https://doi.org/10.2196/13769
[228] ‘Paperdemic’ during the COVID-19 pandemic — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2022.09.030
[235] The Meanings of Publication in Open Access Journal: Experience of State Islamic University's Lecturers — https://doi.org/10.15408/insaniyat.v6i2.25462
[238] Dynamics of Journal Impact Factors and Limits to Their Inflation — https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.1.06
[239] Visualizing Collaboration Characteristics and Topic Burst on International Mobile Health Research: Bibliometric Analysis — https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9581
[240] Does research through Structured Operational Research and Training (SORT IT) courses impact policy and practice? — https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.15.0062
[243] Global Research on Smoking and Pregnancy—A Scientometric and Gender Analysis — https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110605792
[246] Thesis Supervisors as Literacy Brokers in Brazil — https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030026
[262] Assessing the Scientific Research Productivity of the Palestinian Higher Education Institutions — https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014544287
[263] Incentives to Open Access: Perspectives of Health Science Researchers — https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8020029
[273] Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture — https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0076-2
[296] Arbitrariness of bibliometric parameters: a case study on leading scientists in the German Society for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (DGPT) — https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03195-4

Future of Scientific Publishing: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

DOI: 10.62487/saimsarada26548b

Get access to the full paper