SAIMSARA Journal

Machine Generated Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Peripheral Artery Disease Treatment: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Vascular Health icon

Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-04-11 11:05:11
What is this paper about
PAD is not failing for lack of options — it is failing because the right options are too often used in isolation, too late, or not at all. This review shows where the strongest treatment signals truly are, from rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin and exercise therapy to IVUS-guided revascularization, and why real progress depends on combining them into one strategy.

DOI: 10.62487/saimsarafa4dc087

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to synthesize current evidence regarding the risk factors, diagnostic screening tools, and therapeutic interventions for peripheral artery disease, with a focus on improving limb salvage and cardiovascular outcomes. The review utilises 3585 original studies with 35864537 total participants (topic deduplicated ΣN). The mapped evidence suggests that contemporary peripheral artery disease care is most consistently strengthened by intensive secondary prevention, structured exercise, and selective revascularization, with dual-pathway inhibition standing out as a prominent signal: low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin was associated with a 43% reduction in major adverse limb events and a 58% reduction in total vascular amputations in stable peripheral artery disease, while post-revascularization analyses showed hazard ratios of about 0.85 to 0.86 for ischemic event reduction. Across the broader treatment landscape, supervised and home-based exercise improved walking performance, cilostazol and statins supported symptom and event reduction, and drug-coated balloons, drug-eluting stents, intravascular lithotripsy, and intravascular ultrasound-guided intervention were repeatedly associated with better procedural or patency-related outcomes in selected anatomic settings. At the same time, the evidence map highlights that treatment benefit is strongly modified by diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, frailty, bleeding risk, and major socioeconomic and sex-based disparities in access to guideline-directed care. Clinically, these findings support a multidisciplinary model in which aggressive medical therapy, exercise rehabilitation, and anatomy-specific revascularization are integrated rather than treated as competing strategies. Because much of the literature remains heterogeneous and a substantial share is observational, future research should prioritize pragmatic and phenotype-specific trials that clarify optimal antithrombotic selection, limb-specific effects of newer metabolic therapies, and implementation strategies that reduce undertreatment and inequity in peripheral artery disease care.

Keywords: Peripheral artery disease; Ankle-brachial index; Lower-extremity amputation; Revascularization; Cardiovascular risk factors; Critical limb ischemia; Secondary prevention; Major adverse limb events; Endovascular repair; Disease screening

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

The full evidence review, including the Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, figures, and complete reference index, opens after purchase or sign-in.

Reference Index (350)