SAIMSARA Journal

Machine-Readable Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Remote Robotic Surgery, Telesurgery, 5G Network Safety, Latency, and Haptic Feedback: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Digital Health & Biotech icon

Digital Health & Biotech

Issue 3, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara6d83bd41

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-05-26 13:37:38
What is this paper about
Remote robotic surgery is no longer science fiction: the evidence shows real feasibility across 5G telesurgery, neurovascular intervention, spine surgery, and remote mentoring, but only when latency, bandwidth, redundancy, cybersecurity, and feedback systems are treated as clinical safety infrastructure. The full evidence map shows where remote robotic surgery is already clinically credible, where it remains experimental, and which technical safeguards will determine whether distance-separated surgery becomes a safe medical service or only a technological demonstration.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.

Video summary generated from this ☸️SAIMSARA evidence map. Full reference-linked paper and evidence JSON are available after purchase.


Abstract: To map and synthesize original studies relevant to remote robotic surgery, with emphasis on feasibility, safety, network performance, control strategies, haptic and visual feedback, mentoring workflows, and translational readiness across clinical and experimental settings. The review uses 151 references and builds its evidence map from 207 original studies with 4300 total participants/sample observations (topic-deduplicated ΣN). Across clinical, preclinical, and engineering studies, the dominant signal is that remote robotic surgery is technically feasible but conditionally safe, with outcomes tightly coupled to network performance, latency control, and feedback fidelity. Human cases completed without complications under tightly managed conditions, including 5G urological surgery with maximum latency 129.3 ms and remote nephrectomy with 26 ms median round-trip delay, whereas suboptimal 3-Mbps bandwidth degraded image quality and increased operator fatigue. The evidence supports a role for remote robotic surgery as a systems-level intervention requiring integrated network, haptic, and human-factors safeguards rather than a stand-alone clinical service. Redundant connectivity, predictive compensation, and remote-center-of-motion safety mechanisms emerged as recurrent enabling strategies. Future prospective multicenter studies with standardized network and safety reporting are needed to determine where remote robotic surgery delivers clinically meaningful benefit beyond feasibility.

Keywords: Remote robotic surgery; Telesurgery; 5G networks; Network latency; Tactile Internet; Haptic feedback; Packet loss; Remote proctoring; Augmented reality; Surgical training

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

Full paper access includes the complete human-readable review, figures, reference index, PDF export, and machine-readable Evidence JSON download.
Evidence JSON can also be purchased separately if you only need the LLM-ready object for agent, AI, or RAG workflows.
Institutional or library access? Sign in with your institution email to open all available SAIMSARA papers under your institution access arrangement.
Need a SAIMSARA review on your own topic? ☸️Request.

Reference Index (151)

Unlock the full paper to view the complete Reference Index.