SAIMSARA Journal

Machine Generated Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Factors: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Cardiac & Vascular Health icon

Cardiac & Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara276e7e2b

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-05-03 09:38:34
What is this paper about
AAA risk is not just “age and diameter”: this review shows smoking as the dominant driver, diabetes as a paradoxically protective signal, and women as lower-prevalence but higher-risk patients once aneurysm develops. The full evidence map explains which biological, anatomical, genetic, and post-EVAR surveillance signals may move AAA risk assessment beyond diameter alone.
Additional notes
Reference [526] is a preprint indexed in the retrieved database; retained as supportive, non–peer-reviewed evidence.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.


Abstract: To synthesize the current body of evidence regarding the multi-dimensional risk factors associated with the incidence, expansion, and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms, as well as the predictors of postoperative complications and mortality. The review cites 224 references and is based on 1392 original studies comprising 21004519 total participants (topic-deduplicated ΣN). Within this evidence map, cigarette smoking emerged as the dominant and most consistently replicated risk signal for abdominal aortic aneurysm, with screening cohorts reporting odds ratios as high as 5.57 in male veterans and hazards up to 15.59 in older Swedish men, while diabetes mellitus was paradoxically associated with a 37% to 63% lower probability of aneurysm growth. The synthesis indicates that traditional drivers such as older age, male sex, hypertension, and adverse lipid profiles remain central to incidence, while women showed lower prevalence yet higher rupture risk and worse postoperative mortality, including an odds ratio of 1.68 for mortality after elective repair in registry data. Mechanistic and predictive signals converged around biomechanical metrics including peak wall rupture index and low wall shear stress, intraluminal thrombus burden, inflammatory markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, coagulation biomarkers like D-dimer, and emerging proteomic and polygenic risk scores that outperform diameter alone. Clinically, the map supports rigorous post-endovascular surveillance, pharmacological optimization with statins and metformin, and consideration of expanded screening for high-risk subgroups missed by current age- and sex-based criteria. Heterogeneity in alcohol, lipid, and biomarker findings, together with the predominantly retrospective and observational nature of included evidence, limits causal interpretation. Future research should prioritize prospective validation of integrated biomechanical, proteomic, and polygenic risk models alongside sex-specific intervention thresholds to advance personalized screening and rupture-risk stratification beyond maximum diameter.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Risk factors; Cigarette smoking; Genetic susceptibility; Aneurysm rupture; Endovascular repair; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular health; Biomarkers; Gender differences

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

The full evidence review, including the Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, figures, and complete reference index, opens after purchase or sign-in. The Evidence Object JSON is a separate machine-readable evidence product: a concentrated synthesis of results, topic-level evidence, and discussion across original and non-original studies. It can be directly input into your LLM, agent, or RAG workflow.

Reference Index (224)