SAIMSARA Journal

Machine Generated Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Aortic Dissection Prevalence: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Cardiac & Vascular Health icon

Cardiac & Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara9f77c469

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-04-28 08:12:01
What is this paper about
Aortic dissection prevalence is not one number — it changes dramatically by clinical setting, genetics, anatomy, sleep apnea, mental health burden, and referral selection. This review is worth reading because it maps where “rare disease” thinking fails and where targeted screening may reveal preventable high-risk phenotypes.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.


Abstract: The aim of this review is to synthesize contemporary evidence regarding the prevalence of aortic dissection across diverse clinical settings and populations, while identifying key anatomical, genetic, and comorbid predictors associated with the condition. The review utilises 145 references. The mapped evidence indicates that aortic dissection prevalence is highly context-dependent, ranging from 0.3% in undifferentiated emergency chest-pain presentations to 10–25% in Marfan syndrome and up to 88.7% in selectively transferred suspected acute aortic syndrome cohorts. Recurrent signals across topics highlight a strikingly high burden of obstructive sleep apnea (61%–66.2%), post-traumatic stress disorder (21.4%–31.5%), and bovine aortic arch variation in dissection and broader thoracic aortopathy cohorts (15.6%–31.1%), alongside a consistent inverse association with diabetes mellitus. Heritable contribution emerged as a dominant theme, with familial factors accounting for an estimated 27.9% to 57% of liability and pathogenic variant yields reaching 51.5% in selected thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection cohorts. Clinically, these patterns support integrating genetic evaluation, sleep assessment, and structured psychological screening into longitudinal management of dissection survivors, while flagging anatomical variants on routine imaging. The evidence remains heterogeneous in denominators and dominated by retrospective single-center cohorts, which limits certainty around true population-level burden. Future research should prioritize prospective multicenter registries with standardized prevalence reporting to clarify the diabetes paradox, the mechanistic role of obstructive sleep apnea in false-lumen behavior, and sex- and age-specific phenotypes that currently drive much of the observed heterogeneity.

Keywords: Aortic dissection prevalence; Stanford Type A; Stanford Type B; Genetic heritability; Obstructive sleep apnea; Malperfusion syndrome; Aortic arch variants; Intracranial aneurysms; Acute aortic syndrome; Thoracic aortic aneurysm

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

The full evidence review, including the Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, figures, and complete reference index, opens after purchase or sign-in. The Evidence Object JSON is a separate machine-readable evidence product: a concentrated synthesis of results, topic-level evidence, and discussion across original and non-original studies. It can be directly input into your LLM, agent, or RAG workflow.

Reference Index (145)