SAIMSARA Journal

Machine Generated Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Aortic Dissection Risk Factors: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Cardiac & Vascular Health icon

Cardiac & Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara02c92be3

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-04-28 07:04:44
What is this paper about
Aortic dissection is not predicted by diameter alone: hypertension, genetics, aortic geometry, pregnancy, medications, sleep apnea, inflammation, and environmental triggers all reshape individual risk. The full paper is worth reading because it maps where classic thresholds fail — and where modern risk stratification may prevent missed catastrophic events.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.


Abstract: This review aims to synthesize the diverse clinical, genetic, environmental, and anatomical risk factors associated with the development, propagation, and prognosis of aortic dissection based on recent cohort and case-control evidence. The review utilises 191 references. Across the mapped evidence, uncontrolled hypertension emerged as the most prominent and consistently replicated modifiable signal for aortic dissection, accounting for more than 50% of the population-attributable risk and supported by hazard ratios such as 2.64 for incident dissection in population cohorts. Smoking, older age, male sex, family history (relative risk 6.82), and syndromic predisposition including Marfan syndrome (present in 44% of necropsy dissection cases), bicuspid aortic valve (9–18-fold excess risk), and ACTA2 mutations (76% lifetime aortic-event risk) further dominated the topic-level synthesis. The map also highlighted that a substantial share of dissections occur below the conventional 5.5 cm surgical threshold (with one series reporting 80.4% dissecting below 55 mm), supporting a role for geometric, length-based, volumetric, and polygenic risk metrics alongside diameter for refined stratification. Recurrent secondary signals included malperfusion, persistent false lumen patency, elevated D-dimer and inflammatory composites, renal dysfunction, pregnancy, fluoroquinolone and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor exposures, sleep-disordered breathing, and environmental triggers such as low ambient temperature and air pollution, all of which indicate clinically actionable pharmacovigilance, perioperative, and public-health touchpoints. A practical implication is that risk assessment and surveillance pathways should integrate blood-pressure variability, anatomical and genomic indices, and exposure history rather than relying on diameter alone, particularly in women and non-syndromic patients. Future research should prioritize prospective validation of geometric and polygenic predictors, mechanistic clarification of the diabetes paradox, and longitudinal evaluation of environmental and pharmacological triggers to resolve the heterogeneity observed across the predominantly retrospective evidence base.

Keywords: Aortic dissection; Systemic hypertension; Aortic diameter; Polygenic risk score; Bicuspid aortic valve; Smoking; False lumen thrombosis; Fluoroquinolone use; Obstructive sleep apnea; Thoracic aortic aneurysm

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

The full evidence review, including the Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, figures, and complete reference index, opens after purchase or sign-in. The Evidence Object JSON is a separate machine-readable evidence product: a concentrated synthesis of results, topic-level evidence, and discussion across original and non-original studies. It can be directly input into your LLM, agent, or RAG workflow.

Reference Index (191)