SAIMSARA Journal

Machine Generated Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Arteriovenous Graft vs Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA.

Cardiac & Vascular Health icon

Cardiac & Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara9e01f3c8

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-05-09 13:40:22
What is this paper about
This SAIMSARA review maps 261 original studies comparing AVF and AVG for hemodialysis access, showing where fistulas dominate on durability, infection, mortality, and cost — and where grafts may be clinically preferable for frail, catheter-dependent, or poor-vein patients. The full evidence map gives humans and LLMs a structured, reference-linked view of patency, complications, survival, economics, patient subgroups, and access-selection trade-offs — ready for clinical reading, reasoning, and machine-readable evidence use.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.


Abstract: The aim of this scoping review is to synthesize contemporary evidence comparing arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts regarding their patency rates, complication profiles (including infection and thrombosis), economic impact, and suitability across diverse patient demographics. The review utilises 261 original studies with 4335091 total participants (topic deduplicated ΣN). Across the mapped evidence, arteriovenous fistulas emerged as the dominant access type for long-term durability, with 12-month primary patency ranging from approximately 62.2% to 89% versus 46.0% to 56% for grafts, and infection event rates roughly half those seen with grafts (0.17–0.26 vs 0.35–0.39 per 100 patient-months). Recurrent topic-level signals also indicated lower mortality, fewer maintenance interventions, and lower access-related costs for AVFs, while AVGs offered earlier usability, more reliable cannulation in catheter-dependent or frail patients, and a viable salvage role when superficial veins were exhausted. Mechanistic and adjunctive themes, including higher thrombosis hazards with grafts, greater inflammatory response after AVG placement, and modifying effects of antiplatelet therapy, sex, race, diabetes, and frailty, support a more individualized rather than uniformly fistula-first selection strategy. The map is constrained by predominantly retrospective evidence and heterogeneous outcome definitions, so the synthesis should be interpreted as a directional signal rather than a definitive comparative effect. Practically, these findings support prioritizing AVF creation when anatomy and life expectancy permit, while reserving AVGs for patients in whom prolonged catheter exposure or maturation failure is the dominant risk. Future research should focus on prospective, patient-centered decision tools that integrate frailty, vessel mapping, and life expectancy to refine when an AVG is preferable to an AVF and to standardize outcome reporting across access modalities.

Keywords: Arteriovenous fistula; Arteriovenous graft; Hemodialysis access; Primary patency; Secondary patency; End-stage renal disease; Vascular access complications; Infection risk; Patient survival; Catheter-free initiation

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

The full evidence review, including the Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, figures, and complete reference index, opens after purchase or sign-in. The Evidence Object JSON is a separate machine-readable evidence product: a concentrated synthesis of results, topic-level evidence, and discussion across original and non-original studies. It can be directly input into your LLM, agent, or RAG workflow.

Reference Index (119)