SAIMSARA Journal

Machine-Readable Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Risk in Transgender People: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA

Cardiac & Vascular Health icon

Cardiac & Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara9d970a85

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-06-03 12:11:17
What is this paper about
Gender-affirming hormone therapy is not a single cardiovascular exposure: testosterone, estrogen route, anti-androgen choice, age, comorbidity, and monitoring all shift the risk picture. This full read maps 319 original studies, 114 key references, and more than 15.7 million observations to clarify where GAHT appears safer, where vascular risk signals emerge, and what clinicians should watch before relying on generic sex-based risk calculators.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.


Generated with SAIMSARA v4.9

Abstract: To comprehensively map and synthesize the existing evidence on the association between gender-affirming hormone therapy and cardiovascular risk, encompassing clinical outcomes, surrogate markers, and mechanistic pathways, across human cohort, cross-sectional, case, and experimental studies. The review uses 114 references and builds its evidence map from 319 original studies with 15735475 total participants/sample observations (topic-deduplicated ΣN). This scoping review indicates that cardiovascular risk under GAHT is strongly hormone-direction dependent, with masculinizing testosterone consistently associated with adverse lipid shifts, erythrocytosis, arterial stiffness, and endothelial dysfunction, while feminizing regimens show mixed signals dominated by route- and antiandrogen-specific VTE and blood pressure effects. Mechanistic convergence on immune-mediated endothelial dysfunction, including CD4+ T-cell and IL-17 pathways, suggests a biologically plausible substrate linking testosterone exposure to vascular pathology. Clinically, the evidence supports a role for individualized regimen selection—favoring non-oral estrogen and careful antiandrogen choice—alongside surveillance of subclinical vascular markers rather than reliance on sex-based risk calculators alone. However, attribution to GAHT itself remains uncertain given baseline comorbidity burden and conflicting cohort findings. Long-term prospective studies with hard cardiovascular endpoints and TGD-specific risk prediction tools are the central priority.
.

Keywords: Gender-affirming hormone therapy; Cardiovascular risk; Transgender health; Estradiol; Testosterone therapy; Atherosclerosis; Endothelial dysfunction; Venous thromboembolism; Myocardial infarction; Inflammation

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

Full paper access includes the complete human-readable review, figures, reference index, PDF export, and machine-readable Evidence JSON download.
Evidence JSON can also be purchased separately if you only need the LLM-ready object for agent, AI, or RAG workflows.
Institutional or library access? Sign in with your institution email to open all available SAIMSARA papers under your institution access arrangement.
Need a SAIMSARA review on your own topic? ☸️Request.

Reference Index (114)

Unlock the full paper to view the complete Reference Index.