SAIMSARA Journal

Machine-Readable Science • ISSN 3054-3991

RAS and KRAS Inhibitors in Cancer Therapeutic Mechanisms and Resistance: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA

Gastrointestinal & Metabolic Health

Gastrointestinal & Metabolic Health

Issue 9, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsaradc4d1e0f

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-06-01 19:19:41
What is this paper about
RAS/KRAS inhibition has finally moved from “undruggable” promise to therapeutic reality, but this review shows why single-agent targeting is rarely enough. The full read maps 705 original studies to clarify how allele-specific, pan-RAS, RAS(ON), combination, resistance-monitoring, and immune/radiotherapy strategies may shape the next generation of durable cancer control.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.

Generated with SAIMSARA v5.1

Video summary generated from this ☸️SAIMSARA evidence map. Full reference-linked paper and evidence JSON are available after purchase.

Abstract: To map and synthesize original research on RAS and KRAS inhibitors in cancer, with emphasis on direct inhibitors, pan-RAS or pan-KRAS approaches, allele-specific strategies, resistance mechanisms, and rational combinations that may improve treatment selection and durability of response. The review uses 308 references and builds its evidence map from 703 original studies with 74272 total participants/sample observations (topic-deduplicated ΣN). This scoping review indicates that RAS/KRAS inhibition in cancer is therapeutically actionable but is best understood as a systems-level intervention requiring anticipation of pathway reactivation. Across allele-specific, pan-KRAS, pan-RAS, and RAS(ON) approaches, durable control was repeatedly limited by adaptive RAS–MAPK reactivation, receptor tyrosine kinase feedback, and wild-type RAS compensation, with acquired RAS/MAPK alterations emerging in 46% of inhibitor-treated patients and more frequently in colorectal than non-small cell lung cancer (69% versus 26%). The recurrent signal supports a shift toward broader RAS-state targeting and rationally designed combinations with EGFR, SHP2, or MEK partners rather than direct inhibition alone. Practically, this highlights the value of serial molecular profiling to detect heterogeneous, often polyclonal escape mechanisms. Future prospective, longitudinal studies defining allele- and histology-specific resistance trajectories are needed to translate these largely preclinical signals into durable clinical benefit.

Keywords: RAS inhibitors; KRAS inhibitors; KRAS-mutant cancer; Pan-KRAS inhibition; RAS(ON) inhibitors; Sotorasib resistance; MAPK signaling; Combination therapy; Colorectal cancer; Non-small cell lung cancer

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

Full paper access includes the complete human-readable review, figures, reference index, PDF export, and machine-readable Evidence JSON download.
Evidence JSON can also be purchased separately if you only need the LLM-ready object for agent, AI, or RAG workflows.
Institutional or library access? Sign in with your institution email to open all available SAIMSARA papers under your institution access arrangement.
Need a SAIMSARA review on your own topic? ☸️Request.

Reference Index (306)

Unlock the full paper to view the complete Reference Index.