SAIMSARA Journal

Machine-Readable Science • ISSN 3054-3991

Routine Preoperative ECG for Cardiac Risk Stratification Before Noncardiac Surgery: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA

Cardiac & Vascular Health icon

Cardiac & Vascular Health

Issue 1, Volume 1, 2026

DOI: 10.62487/saimsara5e9e7a10

Editorial note
• Last update: 2026-06-12 09:20:58
What is this paper about
Routine preoperative ECG remains a clinical paradox: often low-yield in low-risk noncardiac surgery, yet potentially powerful when combined with biomarkers and AI-driven waveform analysis. The full read shows where ECG can be safely de-implemented, where it still uncovers clinically relevant hidden disease, and how AI-ECG may redefine perioperative cardiac risk stratification.
Human-verified editorial review Verified by World ID proof-of-human. This editorial layer was submitted from a SAIMSARA account verified as a unique human.


Generated with SAIMSARA v5.0

Abstract: To map the existing evidence on the clinical utility, prognostic value, and real-world application of routine preoperative ECG in adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, and to synthesize themes regarding its role in risk stratification, adherence to guidelines, and emerging technological enhancements. The review uses 42 references and builds its evidence map from 105 original studies with 4229860 total participants/sample observations (topic-deduplicated ΣN). This scoping review highlights a central paradox: the visually interpreted routine preoperative ECG offers limited incremental prognostic value for major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic low-to-intermediate risk noncardiac surgery, yet its raw waveform may carry substantial untapped predictive signal. Conventional ECG abnormalities were frequently not independently associated with myocardial injury or MACE, and routine testing did not reduce cancellations in low-risk procedures. In contrast, AI-driven analysis of preoperative ECG waveforms was associated with markedly improved discrimination, with AUROCs up to 0.909 for 30-day mortality versus 0.728 for ESC guideline-based risk stratification and 0.725 for the RCRI. These findings suggest that future value lies less in traditional interpretation and more in selective, risk-factor-based testing alongside biomarker- and AI-enhanced strategies. The dominant uncertainty—whether AI-ECG tools improve patient outcomes—should be addressed through prospective multicenter validation trials before routine clinical adoption.
.

Keywords: preoperative electrocardiogram; noncardiac surgery; perioperative risk assessment; routine ECG screening; cardiovascular risk prediction; preoperative testing guidelines; postoperative cardiac complications; deep learning ECG analysis; myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery; low-value preoperative care

Review Stats

Get access to the full paper

Unlock the full evidence map

Full paper access includes the complete human-readable review, figures, reference index, PDF export, and machine-readable Evidence JSON download.
Evidence JSON can also be purchased separately if you only need the LLM-ready object for agent, AI, or RAG workflows.
Institutional or library access? Sign in with your institution email to open all available SAIMSARA papers under your institution access arrangement.
Need a SAIMSARA review on your own topic? ☸️Request.

Reference Index (42)

Unlock the full paper to view the complete Reference Index.